Substantial federal activity supports Indigenous-led institutions in building administrative and service delivery capacity for public services. The clearest evidence sits in three domains: First Nations health service delivery, led by the First Nations Health Authority (FNHA) in British Columbia and five additional regional health transformation initiatives now underway; Indigenous child and family services jurisdiction under An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families, which came into force in January 2020 and was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in February 20242; and First Nations governance and fiscal administration through the New Fiscal Relationship (NFR) 10-Year Grant, co-developed with the Assembly of First Nations and the First Nations Financial Management Board (FNFMB). Further activity is visible in education through the Anishinabek Nation Education Agreement and the Kinoomaadziwin Education Body, and in policing through ongoing co-development of essential service legislation. Significant gaps remain in the pace of transfer outside British Columbia, the adequacy of funding relative to service need, the uneven coverage of Métis, Inuit, and urban Indigenous populations, and the absence of tabled federal First Nations policing legislation.
Supporting Evidence
-
Developing Data Governance Agreements with Indigenous Communities in Canada
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:The publication examines the development of data governance agreements with Indigenous communities in Canada, emphasizing Indigenous data sovereignty, collaborative decision-making for public health interventions, and the critical role of time, resources, education, and planning in shaping broader public health policy.
Topics & Keywords:Data sovereignty, Indigenous rights to self-determination, Indigenous-led data governance, Nation-to-nation public health relationships, Tuberculosis prevention and careLimitations:The study is limited by the significant time, resources, education, and planning required to respect Indigenous data sovereignty and governance, and its findings may have limited generalizability due to the focus on select First Nations and Métis partnering communities.
More Information About Developing Data Governance Agreements with Indigenous Communities in Canada
-
The consequences of “benevolent” colonial powers and structural inequities in the implementation of Jordan’s Principle in Manitoba, Canada
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:The paper examines Jordan’s Principle implementation in Manitoba, identifying the need to shift from biomedical to relational, culturally sensitive approaches while addressing structural challenges such as high caseloads, waitlists, administrative burdens, and inadequate infrastructure that hinder First Nations-led initiatives.
Topics & Keywords:digital infrastructure, First Nations children, Jordan's Principle, structural inequities, telehealthLimitations:The study did not collect sociodemographic data to protect participant anonymity, and structural barriers including lack of digital infrastructure, insufficient funding for planning and coordination, and the reactive nature of Jordan’s Principle’s current structure limited the scope and preventive potential of the research findings.
More Information About The consequences of “benevolent” colonial powers and structural inequities in the implementation of Jordan’s Principle in Manitoba, Canada
-
Best Practices to Support the Self-Determination of Indigenous Communities, Collectives, and Organizations in Health Research through a Provincial Health Research Network Environment in British Columbia, Canada
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:The paper identifies limitations in Canada’s health research funding landscape and presents the BC NEIHR as a solution, outlining three best practices—capacity-bridging initiatives, relational research relationships, and partnerships—to support Indigenous self-determination, overcome funding barriers, build trust, and transform the health research landscape toward reconciliation.
Topics & Keywords:Capacity-bridging initiatives, Funding barriers, Indigenous health research, Indigenous-led networks, Self-determinationLimitations:The study faces budget and resource constraints limiting relational research, high travel costs restricting access to remote ICCOs, inequitable research capacity favoring larger urban ICCOs, a need for regionally based interventions, timeline constraints hindering culturally relevant relationship building, and sustainability challenges due to limited funding terms for health research networks.
More Information About Best Practices to Support the Self-Determination of Indigenous Communities, Collectives, and Organizations in Health Research through a Provincial Health Research Network Environment in British Columbia, Canada