The status is Active. Responsive activity exists because Canada’s federal research support system has developed, documented, and begun implementing Indigenous-guided approaches for supporting Indigenous research and research training. The strongest evidence is the Canada Research Coordinating Committee’s Setting New Directions to Support Indigenous Research and Research Training in Canada, which was co-developed with Indigenous Peoples and identifies new models for supporting Indigenous research priorities, accessibility, leadership, self-determination, and capacity. The Indigenous Leadership Circle in Research advises the federal research funding agencies and the Canada Foundation for Innovation on implementation of that plan, and the plan has been extended to 2029 to continue implementation, impact assessment, and engagement. Agency-level work also exists through SSHRC’s Indigenous research principles, CIHR’s Indigenous health research action plan, and tri-agency work on Indigenous citizenship and membership affirmation. The status is Active because the Call asks for a determination of how national research support should assist Indigenous initiatives and research projects; however, the proposed new capstone research funding organization is still under development, and Indigenous advisors have raised concerns about insufficient Indigenous engagement in that process.
Supporting Evidence
-
Niqivut Silalu Asijjipalliajuq: Building a Community-Led Food Sovereignty and Climate Change Research Program in Nunavut, Canada
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:A community-led research program in Nunavut, Canada, guided by the National Inuit Strategy on Research, was developed to address food security, nutrition, and climate change while prioritizing Inuit self-determination and knowledge systems to support community health and well-being.
Topics & Keywords:Climate change adaptation, Community-led research, Food security, Food sovereignty, Inuit self-determinationLimitations:The study was constrained by limited time and funding that restricted community engagement and workshops, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, which hindered research progress by reducing in-person contact and diverting participants toward COVID response efforts.
More Information About Niqivut Silalu Asijjipalliajuq: Building a Community-Led Food Sovereignty and Climate Change Research Program in Nunavut, Canada
-
"A serious rift": The Indigenous Health Research Community's Refusal of the 2014 CIHR Funding Reforms and Underlying Methodological Conservatism
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:The paper examines how CIHR reforms privileged commercial research over community-based projects and reduced inclusiveness in peer review, prompting resistance from Indigenous health researchers that ultimately led CIHR to begin reversing some of these reforms, all within the context of ongoing colonialism and the need for ethical research practices.
Topics & Keywords:Commercialization of health research, community-based research, Ethical guidelines in Indigenous research, Indigenous health research, Methodological conservatismLimitations:The study faces limitations including data collection on virtual peer reviews that may not reflect current perspectives due to COVID-19, ongoing challenges in peer review qualifications and understanding of Indigenous Ways of Knowing, technological shifts complicating community-based participatory research, methodological conservatism limiting research diversity, a gap between Indigenous health researchers’ needs and CIHR reforms due to unilateral consultation, and limited representation from the socio-cultural pillar in the consultation process.
More Information About "A serious rift": The Indigenous Health Research Community's Refusal of the 2014 CIHR Funding Reforms and Underlying Methodological Conservatism