The status is Active (Partial). Responsive activity exists through devolved federal delivery of the Aboriginal Entrepreneurship Program through NACCA and Indigenous Financial Institutions, Indigenous-led capacity-building within the IFI network, First Nations land-management transfer mechanisms, and First Nations fiscal institutions that support economic development, financial administration, local revenues, and infrastructure financing. The First Nations Financial Management Board’s RoadMap project also offers an Indigenous-led strategy for expanded First Nations jurisdiction, institutional capacity, fiscal powers, and clearer service responsibilities across governments. However, the evidence does not show a single coordinated strategy involving all levels of government and Indigenous leaders for devolution or co-management of economic development delivery models. Most activity is federal, program-specific, or First Nations-focused, so implementation is active only in part.
Supporting Evidence
-
Accountability frameworks for Indigenous financial institutions in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:The paper presents case studies from Australia, Canada, and New Zealand to examine co-governance and accountability frameworks in Indigenous financial institutions, integrating Indigenous philosophies and values into governance to provide insights on economic resilience, self-determination, and contributions to economic decolonization and financial justice.
Topics & Keywords:Decolonization, Economic self-determination, Financial justice, Hybrid economy model, Indigenous financial governanceLimitations:The study identifies multiple challenges including overly prescriptive governance standards under the CATSI Act, limited economic flexibility, governance and leadership gaps favoring cultural seniority over business expertise, excessive reporting burdens, regulatory barriers to industry expansion, restricted capital access due to communally owned land collateral limitations, financial instability, limited Indigenous representation in mainstream financial institutions, regulatory environments incompatible with Indigenous governance principles, and state-driven reconciliation frameworks that fail to address historical injustices.
More Information About Accountability frameworks for Indigenous financial institutions in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
-
The connection between wildlife co-management and indigenous well-being: What does the academic literature reveal?
Type of Evidence: Academic Literature
Summary of Key Findings:A systematic review of co-management systems in Canada found that, while no explicit public health analysis was conducted, social determinants of health are prevalent throughout the literature, suggesting a meaningful connection between co-management and Indigenous Peoples’ health and well-being.
Topics & Keywords:Co-management systems, Indigenous knowledge systems, Indigenous well-being, Social determinants of health, Wildlife co-managementLimitations:The existing literature lacks an explicit public health or well-being framework for analyzing co-management, with social determinants of health addressed implicitly rather than through a direct health perspective.
More Information About The connection between wildlife co-management and indigenous well-being: What does the academic literature reveal?